How perception of local people towards rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) can influence on decision-making of human-macaque conflict mitigation?

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

J1Block, Amity Institute of Forestry and Wildlife Science, Amity University, Uttar Pradesh, Sector 125, Noida, 201313, India.

10.22120/jwb.2019.35090

Abstract

A field study was conducted to investigate perception of local people towards conservation of macaques and possible mitigation strategies can be opted to reduce human-macaque conflict in urban landscape. Questionnaire survey was designed to collect qualitative and quantitative information including 608 respondents in and around Asola-Bhatti Wildlife Sanctuary, India during 2016-2017. Our study result showed that there were 21 groups of rhesus macaques available in the study area and caused severe damage to the nearby localities and harassed a total of 466 numbers of individuals. Maximum number of conflict incidences (n=502) were recorded from Sanjay Colony, Bhatti mines area, designated as Site 1 due to maximum availability of food and shelter, large troop size (35-40 individuals) and lack of knowledge of local people. Minimum number of conflict incidences (n=157) were recorded from Surajkund area, designated as Site 7 despite of having multiple food resources because of small troop size (15-20 individuals) and conservation awareness of local people. In this study, we compared socio-cultural aspect of selected locations of study area, socio-economic characteristics of two extreme respondent groups from site 1 and site 7 and also distinguished different age groups of respondents and compared their opinion on mitigation of conflict in urban situation. In the conclusion, it can be said that attitude and perception of local people can contribute in conservation of rhesus macaques and in reducing risk of negative association during conflict. Perception of local people can be helpful in decision making and policy implementation in urban monkey population management.

Keywords


Barwer, M. (1971). Daily activity pattern study of rhesus monkey. Journal of Animal Behaviour, 72(4):165-169.

Beisner B.A., Heagerty A., Seil S.K., Balasubramaniam K.N., Atwill E.R., Gupta B.K., Tyagi P.C., Chauhan N.P., Bonal B.S., Sinha P.R., McCowan B. 2015. Human–wildlife conflict: proximate predictors of aggression between humans and rhesus macaques in India. American journal of physical anthropology 156(2): 286-294.

Conly J.M., Johnston B.L. 2008. Canadian Journal of Infect Disease and Medical Microbiology. 1(19): 12-14.

Deb P., Rai P.K., Bhattacharjee P.C. 2014. Human-Monkey  Conflict  and its  Associated  Problems  at  Badarpurghat,  Karimganj, Assam (India). Issues and Trends of Wildlife Conservation in Northeast India. pp. 199-202.   

Devi O.S., Saikia P.K. 2008. Human-monkey conflict: a case study at Gauhati University Campus, Jalukbari, Kamrup, Assam. Zoos Print Journal 23(2): 15-18.

Estrada A., Garber P.A., Rylands A.,  Roos C., Fernandez-Duque E., Di Fiore A., Nekaris K. A. I., Nijman V.,  Heymann E.W., Lambert J.E.,  Rovero F., Barelli C., Setchell J.M., Gillespie T.R., Mittermeier R.A., Arregoitia L.V., De Guinea M., Gouveia S., Dobrovolski R., Shanee S., Shanee N., Boyle S.A., Fuentes A., K. MacKinnon K.C., Amato K.R., Meyer A. L. S., Wich S., Sussman R.W., Pan R., I. Kone I. and Li B. 2017. Impending extinction crisis of the world’s primates: why primates matter. Science Advances. 3(1): e1600946.

Fuentes A. 2006. Human Culture and Monkey Behavior: Assessing the Contexts of Potential Pathogen Transmission between Macaques and Humans. American Journal of Primatology, 68 (1): 880-896.

Garber P.A., Estrada A. 2009.Advancing the study of South American Primates. In: South American Primates: Comparative Perspectives in the Study of Behavior, Ecology and Conservation, P. A. Garber, A. Estrada, J. C. Bicca-Marques, E. W. Heymann and K. Strier (eds.). Springer, New York. pp. 5–19.

Hoffman M., Tali S., and O’Riain J.M. 2012. Monkey Management: Using Spatial Ecology to Understand the Extent and Severity of Human–Baboon Conflict in the Cape Peninsula, South Africa. Ecology and Society 17(13).

Imam E., Yahya H.S.A. 2002. Management of monkey problem in Aligarh Muslim University, Uttar Pradesh.Zoos’ Print Journal. 17 (1): 685–687.

Khatun U.H., Ahsan M.F., Roskaft E. 2013. Local people’s perceptions of crop damage by Common Langurs (Semnopithecus entellus) and human-langur conflict in Keshabpur of Bangladesh. Environment and Natural Resources Research 3(1): 111– 126.

Lee BPY-H., Chan S. 2011. Lessons and challenges in the management of long-tailed macaques in urban Singapore. In: Gumert MD, Fuentes A, Jones-Engel L (eds) Monkeys on the edge: ecology and management of long-tailed macaques and their interface with humans. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 307–313

Lee C., Phyllis C., Priston N.E.C. 2005. Human Attitudes to Primates: Perceptions of Pests, Conflict and Consequences for Primate Conservation. In Commensalism and Conflict: The Human–Primate Interface, edited by James D. Paterson and Janette Wallis. pp. 1–23.

Medhi R., Chetry D., Chokrovorty B., Bhattacharjee P.C.2007. Status and diversity of temple primates in northeast India.Primate Conservation. 22(1):  135–138.

Mitra S. 2000. Assamese macaque Macaca assamensis. Twilight. 22(1): 51-53.

Pirta R.S. 2009. Biological and ecological bases of behaviour. In: G Misra (Ed.): Psychology in India: Basic Psychological Processes and Human Development. Delhi: Pearson. 1(1):1-67.

Riley E.P. 2007. The human–macaque interface: conservation implications of current & future overlap and conflict in Lore Lindu National Park, Sulawesi, Indonesia. American Anthropologist, 109(1):473–484.

Sha  J. C. M., Gumert M.D., Lee B. P. Y-H., Jones-Engel L., Chan S.,  Fuentes A. 2009. Macaque–Human Interactions and the Societal Perceptions of Macaques in Singapore.American Journal of Primatology. 71(1): 825–839.

Southwick C.H., Malik I., Siddiqi M.F. 2005. Rhesus commensalism in India: problems and prospects. In: Paterson JD, Wallis J (eds) Commensalism and conflict: the human–primate interface. American Society of Primatologists, Norman. pp. 241–257.

Southwick C.H., Siddiqi M.F. 2011. India’s rhesus populations: protectionism      versus conservation management. In: Gumert MD, Fuentes A, Jones-Engel L (eds) Monkeys on the edge: ecology and management of long-tailed macaques & their interface with humans. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 275–292.

Srivastava A., Begum F. 2005. City monkeys (Macaca mulatta): a study of human attitudes. In: Paterson JD, Wallis J (eds) Commensalism and conflict: the human–primate interface. American Society of Primatologists, Norman. pp. 259–269.

Uddin M.M., Ahsan M.F. 2018. Do Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) damage the unpalatable ‎crops during conflict with human? A case study from Rampur village of Narsingdi District in ‎Bangladesh. Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity 2(2): 1-5.